Ketcham v. Ketcham

103 A. 1053, 88 N.J. Eq. 601, 3 Stock. 601, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 318
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1918·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ketcham v. Ketcham, 103 A. 1053, 88 N.J. Eq. 601, 3 Stock. 601, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 318 (N.J. 1918).

103 A. 1053 (Ketcham v. Ketcham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.