Ketcham v. DeRaismes

115 A. 216, 93 N.J. Eq. 494, 8 Stock. 494, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 322
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 9, 1922
StatusPublished

This text of 115 A. 216 (Ketcham v. DeRaismes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ketcham v. DeRaismes, 115 A. 216, 93 N.J. Eq. 494, 8 Stock. 494, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 322 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from null be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For ajfimnance — The Chief-Justice, Swayzb, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacit, Williams, Gardner, Ackekson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A. 216, 93 N.J. Eq. 494, 8 Stock. 494, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketcham-v-deraismes-nj-1922.