Ketcham v. DeRaismes

115 A. 216, 93 N.J. Eq. 494, 8 Stock. 494, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 322
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 9, 1922·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from null be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For ajfimnance — The Chief-Justice, Swayzb, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacit, Williams, Gardner, Ackekson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ketcham v. DeRaismes, 115 A. 216, 93 N.J. Eq. 494, 8 Stock. 494, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 322 (N.J. 1922).

115 A. 216 (Ketcham v. DeRaismes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.