Ketcham v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Ketcham v. Circuit Judge

1 McGrath 1702, 4 Daily L.N. 764

DecidedNovember 17, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1702 (Ketcham v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ketcham v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 1702, 4 Daily L.N. 764 (Mich. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel respondent to dismiss a writ of garnishment, because no notice had been given to the principal defendant, under Nule 35, of the intention to issue the writ.

Denied November 17, 1897.

Held, that it was not the intent of the rule to compel the giving of notices in advance in any case, where, under the old rules of practice, it was not necessary to previously apprise the opposite party in advance of the proceedings about to be taken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel respondent to dismiss a writ of garnishment, because no notice had been given to the principal defendant, under Nule 35, of the intention to issue the writ.

Denied November 17, 1897.

Held, that it was not the intent of the rule to compel the giving of notices in advance in any case, where, under the old rules of practice, it was not necessary to previously apprise the opposite party in advance of the proceedings about to be taken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1702, 4 Daily L.N. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketcham-v-circuit-judge-mich-1897.