Ketcham v. Addonizio

218 A.2d 408, 90 N.J. Super. 504, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 425
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedMarch 24, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 218 A.2d 408 (Ketcham v. Addonizio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ketcham v. Addonizio, 218 A.2d 408, 90 N.J. Super. 504, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 425 (N.J. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm for the reasons set forth in the opinions of Judge Herbert in the Chancery Division, see 86 N. J. Super. 195 (1964).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 A.2d 408, 90 N.J. Super. 504, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketcham-v-addonizio-njsuperctappdiv-1966.