Kesterson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 24, 2020·No. 16-1109·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1109V

************************* * Chief Special Master Corcoran KATHERINE KESTERSON, * * Petitioner, * Filed: March 24, 2020 * v. * * Decision by Stipulation; Damages; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Guillain-Barré Syndrome; Transverse AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Myelitis; Influenza Vaccine. * Respondent. * * *************************

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.

Sarah Christina Duncan, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On September 6, 2016, Katherine Kesterson filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Program”). 2 Petitioner alleges that she suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) and/or Transverse Myelitis (“TM”) as a result of her October 29, 2014 receipt of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine. Moreover, Petitioner alleges that she experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for my actions in this case, I will post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id. 2 The Vaccine Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3758, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 through 34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Individual section references hereafter will be to § 300aa of the Act (but will omit that statutory prefix). Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner to suffer GBS, TM, or any other neurodemyelinating disorder. Nonetheless both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a stipulation (filed on March 24, 2020) that the issues before them could be settled, and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.

I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation (as attached hereto) is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards:

• A lump sum of $450,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

Stipulation ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a) of the Act.

I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review.

2 Case 1:16-w-01109-UNJ Document 77 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) KA THERINE KESTERSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 16-l 109V V. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ________________ )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. Katherine Kesterson, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C . §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the flu vaccine on October 29, 2014.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a neurodemyelinating disorder, including Guillain-

Barre syndrome ("GBS") and/or transverse myelitis ("TM"), as a result of receiving the flu

vaccination, and further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of her injury for more

than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition. Case 1:16-w-01109-UNJ Document 77 Filed 03/24/20 Page 2 of 5

6. Respondent denies that petitioner's alleged neurodemyelinating disorder, including

GBS and/or TM, were caused by the flu vaccine. Respondent further denies that the flu vaccine

caused petitioner any other injury or her current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S .C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $450,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages, including pain and suffering, lost earnings, and past unreimbursable expenses, that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U .S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kesterson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

Kesterson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Kesterson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a