Kestenbaum v. Packaging Plus Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kestenbaum v. Packaging Plus Services, Inc.

267 A.D.2d 356, 699 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13175

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 356 (Kestenbaum v. Packaging Plus Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kestenbaum v. Packaging Plus Services, Inc., 267 A.D.2d 356, 699 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendants Packaging Plus Services, Inc., Pinnacle Direct Marketing, Inc., Richard Alternare, IKEA Industries, Inc., and Chris Gunderson from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated January 11, 1999.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice I. Aronin at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendants Packaging Plus Services, Inc., Pinnacle Direct Marketing, Inc., Richard Alternare, IKEA Industries, Inc., and Chris Gunderson from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated January 11, 1999.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice I. Aronin at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 356, 699 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kestenbaum-v-packaging-plus-services-inc-nyappdiv-1999.