Kesten v. Broadcast Music, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 22, 2021
Docket1:20-cv-08909
StatusUnknown

This text of Kesten v. Broadcast Music, Inc. (Kesten v. Broadcast Music, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kesten v. Broadcast Music, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: □□□ nn a ne a a ne □□ DK DATE FILED:_2/22/2021 NADIM NIMAI KESTEN, : Plaintiffs, : : 20-cv-8909 (LJL) -V- : : ORDER BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., et al., : Defendants. :

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to Defendant ASCAP Enterprises A/K/A American Society of Composures, Authors and Publishers pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Dkt. No. 33. Rule 41 addresses dismissal of actions rather than dismissal of parties. Treating the application as addressed to the Court’s power under Rule 15 or Rule 21 or its inherent power, the Court hereby GRANTS dismissal of all claims as against Defendant ASCAP without prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. See Kerr v. Compagnie de Ultramar, 250 F.2d 860, 864 (2d Cir. 1958); Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. Ican Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105, 108 (2d Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 964. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Defendant ASCAP.

SO ORDERED. Zo wt Dated: February 22, 2020 we Al ae New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.
203 F.2d 105 (Second Circuit, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kesten v. Broadcast Music, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kesten-v-broadcast-music-inc-nysd-2021.