Kessler v. Wenk

31 A.D.2d 798, 297 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4549
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 20, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order entered September 26, 1968 granting plaintiff’s motion to vacate a dismissal of the action and restoring the action to the Trial Term Calendar, reversed, on the law and the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion denied with leave to plaintiff to renew the motion at Special Term upon proper papers including an affidavit of merits to foe furnished by a person having knowledge of the facts. In our opinion, the motion papers require amplification as. .to the nonabandonment of the action and do not satisfy the rule .that a showing of merits must be made by one with knowledge of the facts indicating a viable cause of - action. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Tilzer, McGivern, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kessler v. Wenk, 31 A.D.2d 798, 297 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

31 A.D.2d 798 (Kessler v. Wenk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Giattini
49 A.D.2d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)