Kessler v. Townsley

161 So. 841, 120 Fla. 35, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1336
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 5, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 So. 841 (Kessler v. Townsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kessler v. Townsley, 161 So. 841, 120 Fla. 35, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1336 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review a judgment in favor of the defendants in a suit instituted in the Circuit Court of Volusia County wherein plaintiff sought to recover damages for the alienation of the affections of her husband.

Plaintiff in error contends that there are twenty-six questions of law presented for our determination.

A careful consideration of the record discloses that the evidence was entirely insufficient to have supported a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and, this being true, other matters become of no material consequence.

The judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crum v. Baily
184 So. 774 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 So. 841, 120 Fla. 35, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kessler-v-townsley-fla-1935.