Kessler v. Townsley
This text of 161 So. 841 (Kessler v. Townsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The writ of error brings for review a judgment in favor of the defendants in a suit instituted in the Circuit Court of Volusia County wherein plaintiff sought to recover damages for the alienation of the affections of her husband.
Plaintiff in error contends that there are twenty-six questions of law presented for our determination.
A careful consideration of the record discloses that the evidence was entirely insufficient to have supported a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and, this being true, other matters become of no material consequence.
The judgment should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 So. 841, 120 Fla. 35, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kessler-v-townsley-fla-1935.