Kessler v. State
227 So. 2d 225
Opinion
The circumstantial evidence upon which the jury’s guilty verdict was based is insufficient to support the judgment of conviction of grand larceny. We therefore reverse that judgment and remand the cause with directions to discharge the appellant from custody. Cf. Rollins v- State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 861; Davis v. State, Fla.App.1968, 216 So.2d 28.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kessler v. State, 227 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
227 So. 2d 225 (Kessler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rollins v. State
211 So. 2d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Davis v. State
216 So. 2d 28 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)