Kessler v. Monarch Fire Protection District
This text of 352 S.W.3d 677 (Kessler v. Monarch Fire Protection District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Monarch Fire Protection District (“Monarch”) appeals the judgment entered on a jury’s verdict against it and in favor of Donna Kessler and Dana Buckley. Donna Weiss cross-appeals the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict against her and in favor of Monarch. The parties are familiar with the facts and we will not recite them here. We will, however, discuss the facts as they relate to the issues on appeal. We affirm.
Prior to oral argument, Kessler and Buckley moved for an award of attorneys’ fees on appeal. The motion was taken with the case. Monarch did not file a response to the motion objecting to the award of attorneys’ fees on appeal. Kes-sler and Buckley’s motion for attorneys’ fees on appeal is granted in the amount of $64,930.00 pursuant to Section 213.111.2 RSMo 2000.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 S.W.3d 677, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1533, 2011 WL 5553687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kessler-v-monarch-fire-protection-district-moctapp-2011.