Kessler v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

158 A.D.2d 974, 551 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1513
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 2, 1990·No. Appeal No. 3·Published

Opinion

[975] Under the circumstances of this case, plaintiff was using his insured vehicle within the meaning of section 5102 (b) of the Insurance Law (see also, 11 NYCRR 65.12 [a]; Wagman v American Fid. & Cas. Co., 304 NY 490) at the time he sustained injury. Thus he is entitled to first-party benefits from defendant (see, Matter of 20th Century Ins. Co. [Lumbermen’s Mut. Cas. Co.], 80 AD2d 288). Accordingly, that portion of the order that denied plaintiff first-party benefits must be reversed. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kessler v. Liberty Mutual Insurance, 158 A.D.2d 974, 551 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 974 (Kessler v. Liberty Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.
109 N.E.2d 592 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
In re the Arbitration between 20th Century Insurance & Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.
80 A.D.2d 288 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)