Kessler v. Katz
212 A.D. 838
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The trial court erred in declining to charge as requested at folio 142, and the judgment and order are reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The very purpose for which the animal was kept, viz., for protection, and as a watch dog, [839] charges the defendant with knowledge of his character, even though it does not appear that he had bitten others. (Brice v. Bauer, 108 N. Y. 428, 432.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kessler v. Katz, 212 A.D. 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
212 A.D. 838 (Kessler v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strunk v. Zoltanski
468 N.E.2d 13 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Shuffian v. Garfola
9 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)