Kessler v. Ensley Land Co.

148 F. 1019, 79 C.C.A. 534, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4402
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 13, 1906·No. No. 1,556·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CTJRIAM.

The matters complained of in the bill were intra vires the Ensley Land Company, and as the record shows that a majority of the directors and stockholders, at the time of bringing the suit, were not in[1020] terested adversely .to the' company, the right o£ the complainants, • as ■ stockholders, to bring and maintain this suit, is doubtful. If the complainants can bring and. maintain the bill, in prosecuting the same they can only assert the rights and equities which the company itself, if willing to sue, could assert, and any defense good against the Ensley Land Company is good against the complainants. Pour years, during which the defendants, the Ensley Company and others, were exploiting the lands in controversy, elapsed before the suit was brought, and we fail to find sufficient evidence to meet the charge of laches; On the' facta of the case made in the transcript, we concur with the learned judge whose exhaustive opinion is found in the record. The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kessler v. Ensley Land Co., 148 F. 1019, 79 C.C.A. 534, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4402 (5th Cir. 1906).

148 F. 1019 (Kessler v. Ensley Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amen v. Black
234 F.2d 12 (Tenth Circuit, 1956)
Liken v. Shaffer
64 F. Supp. 432 (N.D. Iowa, 1946)
Arn v. Dunnett
93 F.2d 634 (Tenth Circuit, 1937)
Arn v. Operators Royalty & Producing Co.
13 F. Supp. 769 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1936)
Holmes v. Jewett
55 Colo. 187 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1913)