Kessler v. Broder

868 A.2d 1201
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 18, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HOWARD B. KESSLER, M.D., ANDREW H. SHAER, M.D. AND LOCKE W. BARBER, D.O.
v.
GEORGE J. BRODER, M.D., MICHAEL R. CLAIR, M.D., WILLIAM H. HARTZ, M.D., PHILIP J. MODOFSKY, M.D., JAY S. ROSENBLUM, M.D., DELAWARE OPEN MRI RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A., GENERAL PARTNER OF DELAWARE OPEN MRI, L.L.C. AND DELAWARE OPEN MRI II, L.L.C., COUNTY LINE OPEN MRI, INC., GENERAL PARTNER OF PENNSYLVANIA OPEN MRI AT COUNTY LINE PLAZA, L.P., AND PENNSYLVANIA OPEN MRI AT ROOSEVELT PLAZA, L.P., ANDORRA OPEN MRI, INC., GENERAL PARTNER OF ANDORRA OPEN MRI, L.P., AND JEANES RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., AND ITS UNINCORPORATED DIVISION, PENNSYLVANIA OPEN MRI AT GRANT PLAZA,
PETITION OF: GEORGE J. BRODER, M.D., MICHAEL R. CLAIR, M.D., WILLIAM H. HARTZ, MOLDOFSKY & ROSENBLUM.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.

February 18, 2005.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of February, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kessler v. Broder, 868 A.2d 1201 (Pa. 2005).

868 A.2d 1201 (Kessler v. Broder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Contempt of Cullen
868 A.2d 1201 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)