Kessing v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kessing v. State

714 So. 2d 554, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7597, 1998 WL 335982

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 1998

DocketNo. 98-861

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 714 So. 2d 554 (Kessing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kessing v. State, 714 So. 2d 554, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7597, 1998 WL 335982 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kessing appeals from a summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He also filed a letter with this court which we elect to treat as a motion to supplement the record. Because the final order is part of the record on appeal before us, and the remaining items are not sufficiently identified, we deny the motion. We find no merit in Kessing’s appeal and affirm.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kessing appeals from a summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He also filed a letter with this court which we elect to treat as a motion to supplement the record. Because the final order is part of the record on appeal before us, and the remaining items are not sufficiently identified, we deny the motion. We find no merit in Kessing’s appeal and affirm.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

714 So. 2d 554, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7597, 1998 WL 335982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kessing-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack