Kesselman v. Glassheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kesselman v. Glassheim

241 A.D. 710

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Finch, P. J., Martin and O’Malley, JJ., concur; Finch, P. J., and Martin, J., are also of the opinion that the decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; Merrell and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Finch, P. J., Martin and O’Malley, JJ., concur; Finch, P. J., and Martin, J., are also of the opinion that the decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; Merrell and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Kesselman v. Glassheim, 241 A.D. 710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 710 (Kesselman v. Glassheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.