Kesselman v. Glassheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kesselman v. Glassheim

241 A.D. 710

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 710 (Kesselman v. Glassheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kesselman v. Glassheim, 241 A.D. 710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Finch, P. J., Martin and O’Malley, JJ., concur; Finch, P. J., and Martin, J., are also of the opinion that the decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; Merrell and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Finch, P. J., Martin and O’Malley, JJ., concur; Finch, P. J., and Martin, J., are also of the opinion that the decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; Merrell and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kesselman-v-glassheim-nyappdiv-1934.