Kesseler v. Kesseler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kesseler v. Kesseler

9 A.D.2d 643, 194 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6834

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 643 (Kesseler v. Kesseler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kesseler v. Kesseler, 9 A.D.2d 643, 194 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to consolidate the appeals from the orders of June 2, 1958 and of June 30, 1959, in one appeal book, without duplication of printing, and permitting the appeal to be heard on a typewritten record on appeal and on typewritten appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten record and one copy of the typewritten appellant’s points on the attorney for the defendant and files six copies of each thereof with this court on or before December 8, 1959, with notice of argument for the January 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to consolidate the appeals from the orders of June 2, 1958 and of June 30, 1959, in one appeal book, without duplication of printing, and permitting the appeal to be heard on a typewritten record on appeal and on typewritten appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten record and one copy of the typewritten appellant’s points on the attorney for the defendant and files six copies of each thereof with this court on or before December 8, 1959, with notice of argument for the January 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 643, 194 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kesseler-v-kesseler-nyappdiv-1959.