Kess v. State Commissioner

Fourth Circuit

Kess v. State Commissioner

568 F. App'x 251

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 2014

DocketNo. 13-7967

StatusPublished

This text of 568 F. App'x 251 (Kess v. State Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kess v. State Commissioner, 568 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dexter Alphonso Kess appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kess v. State Comm’r, #2116, No. 8:13-ev-3363-DKC (D.Md. Nov. 20, 2013). We deny Kess’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Dexter Alphonso Kess appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kess v. State Comm’r, #2116, No. 8:13-ev-3363-DKC (D.Md. Nov. 20, 2013). We deny Kess’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kess-v-state-commissioner-ca4-2014.