Kess v. State Commissioner

Fourth Circuit

Kess v. State Commissioner

568 F. App'x 251

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13-7967·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dexter Alphonso Kess appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kess v. State Comm’r, #2116, No. 8:13-ev-3363-DKC (D.Md. Nov. 20, 2013). We deny Kess’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Dexter Alphonso Kess appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kess v. State Comm’r, #2116, No. 8:13-ev-3363-DKC (D.Md. Nov. 20, 2013). We deny Kess’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Kess v. State Commissioner, 568 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

568 F. App'x 251 (Kess v. State Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.