Kesner v. Buhl

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HARVEY J. KESNER, Plaintiff, 20Civ. 3454(PAE) -v- ORDER DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. d/b/a BARRON’S, WILLIAM “BILL” ALPERT, and TERI BUHL, Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: The Court has received a voicemail message from counsel for terminated defendants Dow Jones & Co., Inc. and William Alpert inquiring whether the Court intends to issue a partial judgment as to these defendants. The answer is no. Plaintiff Harvey Kesner has not moved for a partial judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Andpartial judgments are disfavored in the Second Circuit. See, e.g.,Ginett v. Comput.Task Grp., Inc., 962 F.2d 1085, 1093 (2d Cir. 1992) (federal policy “disfavors ‘piecemeal’ appellate litigation”);Hogan v. Consol. Rail Corp., 961 F.2d 1021, 1025 (2d Cir. 1992) (federal courts are “empowered to enter a final judgment as to fewer than all of the parties in an action, but ‘only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay’” (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b))). The Court is unaware of any basis for an exception to that policy here. SO ORDERED.

PAUL A. Sunken United States District Judge Dated: March 1, 2021 New York, New York