Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Kesler v. Veal

Kesler v. Veal

367 S.E.2d 132, 186 Ga. App. 93, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 92
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 26, 1988·No. 73452·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Birdsong, Chief Judge.

The Supreme Court affirmed what we said in Kesler v. Veal, 182 Ga. App. 444 (356 SE2d 254) with regard to allowance of damages, including punitive damages for the fraud in a fraudulent conveyance action; but under the facts and circumstances of this case reversed the damages award against the transferee. Accordingly, the trial court is instructed to strike the award of damages against the transferee in this case, H. V. Kesler. See Kesler v. Veal, 257 Ga. 677 (362 SE2d 214).

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Deen, P. J., McMurray, P. J., Banke, P. J., Car ley, Sognier, Pope, Benham and Beasley, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kesler v. Veal, 367 S.E.2d 132, 186 Ga. App. 93, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 92 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).

367 S.E.2d 132 (Kesler v. Veal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawson v. Athens Auto Supply & Electric, Inc.
409 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)