Kesheanna Jackson v. Norac, Inc.

Eighth Circuit

Kesheanna Jackson v. Norac, Inc.

685 F. App'x 510

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 24, 2017

Docket16-2971

StatusUnpublished

This text of 685 F. App'x 510 (Kesheanna Jackson v. Norac, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kesheanna Jackson v. Norac, Inc., 685 F. App'x 510 (8th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this employment-discrimination action, Kesheanna Jackson appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on her harassment and retaliation claims under Title VII and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

This' court agrees with the district court’s reasoning and concludes that summary judgment was properly granted. See Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing record in light most favorable to nonmovant); Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLC, 521 F.3d 914, 917 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court’s determination of state law is reviewed de novo).

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI