Kesheanna Jackson v. Norac, Inc.

685 F. App'x 510
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2017·No. 16-2971·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this employment-discrimination action, Kesheanna Jackson appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on her harassment and retaliation claims under Title VII and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

This' court agrees with the district court’s reasoning and concludes that summary judgment was properly granted. See Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing record in light most favorable to nonmovant); Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLC, 521 F.3d 914, 917 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court’s determination of state law is reviewed de novo).

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kesheanna Jackson v. Norac, Inc., 685 F. App'x 510 (8th Cir. 2017).

685 F. App'x 510 (Kesheanna Jackson v. Norac, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wallace Beaulieu v. Cal Ludeman
690 F.3d 1017 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLC
521 F.3d 914 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)