Keselica v. Moose

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 6, 2004
• Docket: 03-7797
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7797

MICHAEL G. KESELICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES A. MOOSE, in his individual and official capacity as the Montgomery County Police Chief (since resigned); THOMAS P. REICH, in his individual and official capacity as a Montgomery County Police Detective (since retired); MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 03-7824

DOUGLAS GANSLER, in his individual and official capacity as State’s Attorney for Montgomery County, Maryland; BRYAN ROSLUND, in his individual official capacity as Assistant State’s Attorney for Montgomery County, Maryland; FRANK MALONEY, in his individual and official capacity as Assistant State’s Attorney for Montgomery County, Maryland; THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 2703-1-AMD; CA-03-2704-AMD)

Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: April 6, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael G. Keselica, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Michael G. Keselica appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Keselica v.

Moose, No. CA-03-2703-1-AMD; Keselica v. Gansler, No. CA-03-2704-

AMD (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -