Kerzner v. Kerzner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kerzner v. Kerzner

281 A.D.2d 215, 726 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2223

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered February 10, 2000, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff wife’s motion for an award of interim counsel fees in the amount of $50,0000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the financial circumstances of the parties as documented before the court, disclosing, inter alia, that plaintiff has access to some $2 million from the sale of the former marital residence, the denial of plaintiffs motion for an award of interim counsel fees constituted a proper exercise of discretion (see, Mastrandrea v Mastrandrea, 268 AD2d 293). Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered February 10, 2000, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff wife’s motion for an award of interim counsel fees in the amount of $50,0000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the financial circumstances of the parties as documented before the court, disclosing, inter alia, that plaintiff has access to some $2 million from the sale of the former marital residence, the denial of plaintiffs motion for an award of interim counsel fees constituted a proper exercise of discretion (see, Mastrandrea v Mastrandrea, 268 AD2d 293). Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Kerzner v. Kerzner, 281 A.D.2d 215, 726 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

281 A.D.2d 215 (Kerzner v. Kerzner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related