KERWIN WILLIAM MCMAHAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 2021·No. 20-0625·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

KERWIN WILLIAM MCMAHAN, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D20-625

[January 28, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312013CF001035A.

Kerwin William McMahan, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KERWIN WILLIAM MCMAHAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

KERWIN WILLIAM MCMAHAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (KERWIN WILLIAM MCMAHAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.