Kerwin v. Long Island Railroad
157 A.D. 898, 142 N.Y.S. 1125
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The rope furnished by defendant for ordinary use upon its wagons for the purpose of securing the loads of said wagons was a part of the “plant” within the meaning of the statute. (Lipstein v. Provident Loan Society, 154 App. Div. 732.) The action was, therefore, maintainable under the provisions of the Labor Law as amended in 1910.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kerwin v. Long Island Railroad, 157 A.D. 898, 142 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
157 A.D. 898 (Kerwin v. Long Island Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. Ray Arnold Lumber Corp. v. Richardson
141 So. 133 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Martin v. Matson Nat. Co.
244 F. 976 (W.D. Washington, 1917)