Kerwin v. James

43 Ga. 397
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1871
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Ga. 397 (Kerwin v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerwin v. James, 43 Ga. 397 (Ga. 1871).

Opinion

McCay, Judge.

This case turns wholly on the evidence. If the renting was only till the 1st of October, the finding is right; if till the 7th, it is wrong. We incline to think that the weight of the evidence is against the verdict, but there is clearly evidence on the other side. Mr. Whippier testifies, positively, that the tenanfccy was, by the bargain, to expire on the 1st of October. Perhaps the jury gave more weight to this statement, than they did to the statements of the other witnesses. This it was their right to do, especially as the others were parties and this witness had no interest. As we have so often said, the jury is the tribunal to determine the facts; and unless their decision be such as to show passion, mistake, prejudice or misconception, if the Judge below refuses to interfere, it must be a peculiar case to justify this Court in doing so.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Ga. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerwin-v-james-ga-1871.