KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA (KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR.,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D23-2594
March 27, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Mary M. Handsel, Judge.
Kervin Moreno Mujica, Sr., pro se.
KHOUZAM, Judge. The order on appeal is affirmed without prejudice to Mr. Mujica's right to refile the "Motion Ineffective Assistance of Counsel" and "Petition Introduction 3.850/2254" and to file the "Petition Collateral Review" in the trial court after his direct appeal is final. See Bunkley v. State, 800 So. 2d 663, 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) ("A prematurely filed motion for postconviction relief should be dismissed by a trial court and may be refiled after the direct appeal is final."); see also Beaty v. State, 701 So. 2d 856, 857 (Fla. 1997) (holding the two-year period for filing a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 begins to run upon the issuance of the mandate from a direct appeal). This opinion shall not be construed as commenting on the merits of these filings. Affirmed. KELLY and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kervin-moreno-mujica-sr-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.