Kertesz v. Korn

229 F. App'x 301
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 2007
Docket06-51606
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 F. App'x 301 (Kertesz v. Korn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kertesz v. Korn, 229 F. App'x 301 (5th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiffs-Appellants Emery Kertesz, Shelia Kertesz, and Pro Acoustics LLP appeal from the district court’s order granting the supplemental motion of Defendant-Appellee Justin Korn to dismiss the action filed against him in the district court by Plaintiffs-Appellants. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record on appeal, the arguments of the parties as set forth in their appellate briefs, the applicable law, and the extensive analysis and ruling set forth in the district court’s order. In the final analysis, we are convinced that the district court’s dismissal of the action against Defendant-Appellee Justin Korn for lack of personal jurisdiction is correct and free of error. For essentially the reasons set forth by the district court in its thorough and thoughtful analysis, the order appealed from is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kertesz v. GVC and Korn
698 F.3d 89 (Second Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 F. App'x 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kertesz-v-korn-ca5-2007.