Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel

157 S.W.3d 762, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 375, 2005 WL 589613

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2005

DocketED 84115

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.W.3d 762 (Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel, 157 S.W.3d 762, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 375, 2005 WL 589613 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Catherine Magallanes appeals from the judgment modifying a prior judgment of paternity and consent order. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Catherine Magallanes appeals from the judgment modifying a prior judgment of paternity and consent order. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.W.3d 762, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 375, 2005 WL 589613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kersting-ex-rel-kersting-v-hertsel-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack