Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel
157 S.W.3d 762, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 375, 2005 WL 589613
Opinion
ORDER
Catherine Magallanes appeals from the judgment modifying a prior judgment of paternity and consent order. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel, 157 S.W.3d 762, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 375, 2005 WL 589613 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
157 S.W.3d 762 (Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barton v. Barton
157 S.W.3d 762 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)