Kerstin Jones v. Roderick Darryl Jones

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 19, 2014
Docket13-14-00294-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kerstin Jones v. Roderick Darryl Jones (Kerstin Jones v. Roderick Darryl Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerstin Jones v. Roderick Darryl Jones, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00294-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

KERSTIN JONES, APPELLANT,

v.

RODERICK DARRYL JONES, APPELLEE.

On appeal from the 267th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Kerstin Jones, appeals from a judgment of divorce involving minor

children. She proceeds pro se and is incarcerated. On June 6, 2014, appellant filed a

motion to appoint attorney and motion to appeal as an indigent. Texas has statutorily provided for appointed counsel in juvenile delinquency cases,

in parental termination cases, and in cases in which application for court-ordered mental

health services has been made. Gibson v. Tolbert, 102 S.W.3d 710, 712–13 (Tex.

2003). The Texas Legislature has also provided for the possibility of appointed counsel

in other civil matters by conferring upon a district court judge the discretion to “appoint

counsel to attend to the cause of a party who makes an affidavit that he is too poor to

employ counsel to attend to the cause.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §24.016 (West, Westlaw

through 2013 C.S.); see Gibson, 102 S.W.3d at 712. Under exceptional circumstances,

“the public and private interests at stake [may be] such that the administration of justice

may best be served by appointing a lawyer to represent an indigent civil litigant.”

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Mayfield, 923 S.W.2d 590, 594 (Tex. 1996).

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of

a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. Whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal;

2. Whether appellant is indigent;

3. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to her indigency;

4. Whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel; and,

5. What orders, if any should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant's appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently pursued.

2 If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal and

that appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall

appoint counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If counsel is appointed, the name,

address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number of said counsel shall

be included in an order appointing counsel.

The trial court shall cause its finding and recommendations, together with any

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record

of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the

expiration thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 19th day of June, 2014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson v. Tolbert
102 S.W.3d 710 (Texas Supreme Court, 2003)
Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Mayfield
923 S.W.2d 590 (Texas Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kerstin Jones v. Roderick Darryl Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerstin-jones-v-roderick-darryl-jones-texapp-2014.