Kerstein v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kerstein v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

247 A.D. 822

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services on the ground of negligence. Plaintiffs’ automobile, stopped in obedience to a traffic signal, was struck in the rear by defendant’s trolley car and the plaintiff wife, pregnant at the time, was severely injured. Order setting aside verdicts for the plaintiffs on the ground of inadequacy and granting a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services on the ground of negligence. Plaintiffs’ automobile, stopped in obedience to a traffic signal, was struck in the rear by defendant’s trolley car and the plaintiff wife, pregnant at the time, was severely injured. Order setting aside verdicts for the plaintiffs on the ground of inadequacy and granting a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Kerstein v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 247 A.D. 822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 822 (Kerstein v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.