Kershaw-York v. Wolfinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kershaw-York v. Wolfinger

309 A.D.2d 1229, 765 N.Y.S.2d 536, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10040

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 309 A.D.2d 1229 (Kershaw-York v. Wolfinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kershaw-York v. Wolfinger, 309 A.D.2d 1229, 765 N.Y.S.2d 536, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from so much of an order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Gerace, J.), entered June 6, 2002, which, inter alia, granted the motion for summary judgment of defendants Harold H. Wolfinger, Jr., and Carl G. Clark, doing business as Clark and Wolfinger, dismissing the complaint against them, and granted in part defendant RAM Forest Products, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from so much of an order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Gerace, J.), entered June 6, 2002, which, inter alia, granted the motion for summary judgment of defendants Harold H. Wolfinger, Jr., and Carl G. Clark, doing business as Clark and Wolfinger, dismissing the complaint against them, and granted in part defendant RAM Forest Products, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 A.D.2d 1229, 765 N.Y.S.2d 536, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kershaw-york-v-wolfinger-nyappdiv-2003.