Kershaw v. State

92 So. 624, 84 Fla. 69
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 30, 1922·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a consideration of the record herein it clearly appears that the evidence does not sustain the verdict, therefore the judgment should be and is reversed for a new trial at the expense of Monroe' County.

Browne, C. J. and Taylor, Whitfield,'Ellis and West, J J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kershaw v. State, 92 So. 624, 84 Fla. 69 (Fla. 1922).

92 So. 624 (Kershaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.