Kershaw v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Fourth Circuit

Kershaw v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

61 F. App'x 881

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 29, 2003·No. No. 02-2101·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sheila H. Kershaw appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) based on the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kershaw v. Commissioner, No. CA-02-131-1-T (W.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sheila H. Kershaw appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) based on the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kershaw v. Commissioner, No. CA-02-131-1-T (W.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Kershaw v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 61 F. App'x 881 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

61 F. App'x 881 (Kershaw v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.