Kershaw v. Behm (In re Kershaw)

106 B.R. 144, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12436
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee
DecidedAugust 11, 1989
DocketBankruptcy No. 383-00432; Civ. A. No. 3:88-0947
StatusPublished

This text of 106 B.R. 144 (Kershaw v. Behm (In re Kershaw)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kershaw v. Behm (In re Kershaw), 106 B.R. 144, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12436 (M.D. Tenn. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER AND STAY

NEESE, Senior District Judge.

The appellants filed on October 11,. 1988 a notice of appeal from the orders of July 12, 1988 and September 28, 1988 of the Bankruptcy Court of this District. Rule 8006, Bankruptcy Rules, required the appellants to designate, within 10 days after the filing of such notice of appeal, items to be included in this record on appeal and a statement of issues to be presented.

As 10 months have now elapsed since the filing of such notice, without such designation’s having been made, this Court must affirm summarily the foregoing orders of our Bankruptcy Court, Rule 17, Local Rules of Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 B.R. 144, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kershaw-v-behm-in-re-kershaw-tnmd-1989.