Kersh v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.

136 S.E. 85, 36 Ga. App. 188, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 850
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 14, 1926
Docket17557
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 S.E. 85 (Kersh v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kersh v. Savannah Electric & Power Co., 136 S.E. 85, 36 Ga. App. 188, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 850 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The petition, as finally amended and as in part deleted by special demurrers which were sustained (the judgment upon such demurrers not being excepted to), did not set out a cause of action; and as the last amendment to the petition did not conform to the previous ruling, not excepted to, stipulating that unless the petition, within a specified time, should be so amended as to meet specified rulings on the demurrers, the case would stand dismissed, the court did not err in striking the amendment and dismissing the ease.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norton v. Brown
159 S.E. 702 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.E. 85, 36 Ga. App. 188, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kersh-v-savannah-electric-power-co-gactapp-1926.