Kerry Lee Nixon v. James Rector, Oceana Commissary Store, and Christopher P. Martin, Agency Representative, Department of the Navy, Navy Resale System Support, Office Commissary Division
This text of 911 F.2d 723 (Kerry Lee Nixon v. James Rector, Oceana Commissary Store, and Christopher P. Martin, Agency Representative, Department of the Navy, Navy Resale System Support, Office Commissary Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
911 F.2d 723
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kerry Lee NIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James RECTOR, Oceana Commissary Store, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Christopher P. Martin, Agency Representative, Department of
the Navy, Navy Resale System Support, Office
Commissary Division, Defendant.
No. 90-2062.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 19, 1990.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 16, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 89-713-N)
Kerry Lee Nixon, appellant pro se.
Susan Lynn Watt, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Kerry Lee Nixon appeals from the district court's order denying relief in his Title VII action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nixon v. Martin, C/A No. 89-713-N (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Senior Judge Butzner recused himself from participation in this appeal. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46(d)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
911 F.2d 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerry-lee-nixon-v-james-rector-oceana-commissary-store-and-christopher-ca4-1990.