Kerrigan v. Fielding
63 N.Y.S. 1110
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kerrigan v. Fielding. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 A.D. 246 →
Opinion
No opinion. Motion for reargument denied. Order of this court resettled, so as to direct a new trial, costs to abide the final award of costs, instead of directing judgment against the defendants Fielding, Corrigan, Jackson, and Mrs. Firth. All concur, except HIRSCHBERG, J., who took no part. See 62 N. Y. Supp. 115.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kerrigan v. Fielding, 63 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
63 N.Y.S. 1110 (Kerrigan v. Fielding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kerrigan v. Fielding
47 A.D. 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)