Kerri Irene Danz v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 18, 2013
Docket02-12-00383-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kerri Irene Danz v. State (Kerri Irene Danz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerri Irene Danz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00383-CR

KERRI IRENE DANZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF DENTON COUNTY

ABATEMENT ORDER

On March 4, 2013, the court sent Appellant Kerri Irene Danz a letter to

inform her that her court-appointed attorney had filed a motion to withdraw as

counsel on appeal and a brief supporting that motion and to give appellant notice

of her right to examine a copy of the appellate record and her right to respond to

the Anders brief. Our correspondence was returned on March 14, 2013, with no

forwarding address. On March 15, 2013, we resent the letter, and again, on

March 28, 2013, our correspondence was returned as undeliverable. We therefore abate this appeal and remand this case to the trial court.

The trial court shall conduct a hearing, with appellant, appellant’s counsel,

and a representative of the State present, to determine whether appellant desires

to prosecute her appeal, to obtain a valid mailing address and telephone number

for appellant should she wish to continue her appeal, and to take any other

measures that the trial court deems necessary to ensure that appellant does not

forfeit her right to appeal. The trial court shall take any step necessary to ensure

appellant’s presence at the hearing.

The trial court shall file a record of the hearing in this court on or before

Monday, June 3, 2013. The record shall include a supplemental clerk’s record

and supplemental reporter’s record. On our receipt of the supplemental record,

the appeal of this cause shall be automatically reinstated without further order.

Should appellant wish to prosecute her appeal, the time for filing appellant’s pro

se response to the Anders brief shall run from the date of the filing of the

supplemental clerk’s record or supplemental reporter’s record, whichever is filed

last.

The clerk of this court shall transmit a copy of this order to the appellant,

the attorneys of record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the court

reporter.

DATED April 18, 2013

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kerri Irene Danz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerri-irene-danz-v-state-texapp-2013.