Kerr v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.

117 N.E. 310, 228 Mass. 281, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1207
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 20, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 117 N.E. 310 (Kerr v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerr v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co., 117 N.E. 310, 228 Mass. 281, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1207 (Mass. 1917).

Opinion

By the court.

The female plaintiff testified that,- as she was alighting from a car of the defendant, the heels of both her shoes came off, having got caught in the step. There was no evidence as to the kind of step on the car or as to its condition. Plainly there is nothing in the record to indicate negligence on the part of the. defendant or those for whose conduct it was responsible. Thomas v. Boston Elevated Railway, 193 Mass. 438. Perkins v. Bay State Street Railway, 223 Mass. 235.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
79 N.E. 749 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Perkins v. Bay State Street Railway Co.
111 N.E. 717 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 N.E. 310, 228 Mass. 281, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerr-v-worcester-consolidated-street-railway-co-mass-1917.