Kerr v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.

117 N.E. 310, 228 Mass. 281, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1207
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 20, 1917·Published

Opinion

By the court.

The female plaintiff testified that,- as she was alighting from a car of the defendant, the heels of both her shoes came off, having got caught in the step. There was no evidence as to the kind of step on the car or as to its condition. Plainly there is nothing in the record to indicate negligence on the part of the. defendant or those for whose conduct it was responsible. Thomas v. Boston Elevated Railway, 193 Mass. 438. Perkins v. Bay State Street Railway, 223 Mass. 235.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kerr v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co., 117 N.E. 310, 228 Mass. 281, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1207 (Mass. 1917).

117 N.E. 310 (Kerr v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
79 N.E. 749 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Perkins v. Bay State Street Railway Co.
111 N.E. 717 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)