Kerr v. Weisenberg
This text of 405 N.E.2d 179 (Kerr v. Weisenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for our review should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (65 AD2d 815), to which we add only that relinquishment of rights conferred by section 81 of the Civil Service Law may result, on a sufficient demonstration, from an abandonment without the necessity of a written resignation. On this record, however, we agree with the court below that petitioner did not abandon his statutory rights.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
405 N.E.2d 179, 49 N.Y.2d 870, 427 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerr-v-weisenberg-ny-1980.