Kerr v. Weisenberg

405 N.E.2d 179, 49 N.Y.2d 870, 427 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2227
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 1980·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for our review should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (65 AD2d 815), to which we add only that relinquishment of rights conferred by section 81 of the Civil Service Law may result, on a sufficient demonstration, from an abandonment without the necessity of a written resignation. On this record, however, we agree with the court below that petitioner did not abandon his statutory rights.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kerr v. Weisenberg, 405 N.E.2d 179, 49 N.Y.2d 870, 427 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2227 (N.Y. 1980).

405 N.E.2d 179 (Kerr v. Weisenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schoonmaker v. Capital Region Board of Cooperative Educational Services
80 A.D.3d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Lewis v. Cleveland Hill Union Free School District
119 A.D.2d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Piro v. Bowen
76 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)