Kerr v. Swallow

33 Ill. 379
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 33 Ill. 379 (Kerr v. Swallow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerr v. Swallow, 33 Ill. 379 (Ill. 1864).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Beckwith

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a suit by attachment against Anne McKean Kerr and others. The declaration was in assumpsit, and the names of the parties therein are identical with those in the writ. The plea was the general issue, in the usual form, It gives the title of the cause, and then says: “ And the said defendants come and defend the wrong, &c.” There is nothing in the previous proceedings by which the word “ defendants ” can be limited to a less number than all of them, and the plea must he held to be that of all the defendants. In the title of the cause upon the judgment record, the name Anne is spelled Anna, but the judgment was rendered against the defendants in the suit. The variance was not material. ' After appearance .and"- plea the suit was one in personam, and the judgment against the defendants in personam was properly rendered. As the property attached was not released by the defendants’ appearance, a special execution might properly issue. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamb v. People
76 N.E. 576 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1905)
Hogue v. Corbit
41 N.E. 219 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1895)
Kruse v. Wilson
79 Ill. 233 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Ill. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerr-v-swallow-ill-1864.