Kerr v. Rogers

Fourth Circuit

Kerr v. Rogers

671 F. App'x 74

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2016·No. No. 16-7323·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Alan Kerr, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kerr v. Rogers, No. 5:16-cv-00278-MGL, 2016 WL 5076074 (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2016). We deny Kerr’s motion for a certificate of appeala-bility as unnecessary and deny his motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Alan Kerr, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kerr v. Rogers, No. 5:16-cv-00278-MGL, 2016 WL 5076074 (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2016). We deny Kerr’s motion for a certificate of appeala-bility as unnecessary and deny his motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Kerr v. Rogers, 671 F. App'x 74 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 74 (Kerr v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related