Kerr v. Rogers

671 F. App'x 74
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 2016
DocketNo. 16-7323
StatusPublished

This text of 671 F. App'x 74 (Kerr v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerr v. Rogers, 671 F. App'x 74 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Alan Kerr, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kerr v. Rogers, No. 5:16-cv-00278-MGL, 2016 WL 5076074 (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2016). We deny Kerr’s motion for a certificate of appeala-bility as unnecessary and deny his motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 F. App'x 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerr-v-rogers-ca4-2016.