Kerr v. Kerr

219 So. 2d 117
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1969·No. No. 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record and briefs have been thoroughly reviewed and it is the opinion of this court that the appellant has failed, to make error clearly appear. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed on the authority of Pendleton v. Pendleton, Fla. App.1966, 189 So.2d 499, and Tanner v. Tanner, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 702.

Affirmed.

CROSS, McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kerr v. Kerr, 219 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

219 So. 2d 117 (Kerr v. Kerr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bondy v. West
219 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)