Kerr v. Johns Hopkins University

Fourth Circuit

Kerr v. Johns Hopkins University

473 F. App'x 246

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 14, 2012·No. No. 11-2111·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Kerr, M.D., Ph.D., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Kerr v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. 1:10-cv-03294BEL, 2011 WL 4072437 (D.Md. Sept. 12, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Kerr, M.D., Ph.D., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Kerr v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. 1:10-cv-03294BEL, 2011 WL 4072437 (D.Md. Sept. 12, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Kerr v. Johns Hopkins University, 473 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

473 F. App'x 246 (Kerr v. Johns Hopkins University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related