Kerr v. Johns Hopkins University

Fourth Circuit

Kerr v. Johns Hopkins University

473 F. App'x 246

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 2012

DocketNo. 11-2111

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 473 F. App'x 246 (Kerr v. Johns Hopkins University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kerr v. Johns Hopkins University, 473 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Kerr, M.D., Ph.D., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Kerr v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. 1:10-cv-03294BEL, 2011 WL 4072437 (D.Md. Sept. 12, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Kerr, M.D., Ph.D., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Kerr v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. 1:10-cv-03294BEL, 2011 WL 4072437 (D.Md. Sept. 12, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 F. App'x 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerr-v-johns-hopkins-university-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack