Kerr Dry Goods Co. v. Threadgill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Kerr Dry Goods Co. v. Threadgill

1916 OK 573, 157 P. 925, 59 Okla. 39, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1089

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 23, 1916

Docket6630

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 573 (Kerr Dry Goods Co. v. Threadgill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kerr Dry Goods Co. v. Threadgill, 1916 OK 573, 157 P. 925, 59 Okla. 39, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1089 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

WILSON, C.

This case comes to this court on appeal from the county court of Oklahoma county, and was filed on July 16, 1914. The defendant in error, John Thread-gill, having died thereafter, the case was subsequently revived in the name of his adminis-tratrix, Frances Threadgill. Plaintiff in error’s brief was duly served and filed on February 5, 1916.

Although the case has been duly submitted by order of the court, defendants in error liave failed to file an answer brief within the time allowed by the rules of the court, or at all, and no reason has been given for such failure.

Playing examined the plaintiff in error’s brief, and finding that it reasonably well sustains the assignments of error set out in its petition in error, we therefore, without searching the record to find some reason why the judgment of the trial court should *40 be sustained, recommend that ,it be reversed and remanded to the county court of Oklahoma county, with directions that a new trial be granted.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI