Kerpa v. A & A Bros.

534 A.2d 918, 13 Conn. App. 807
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedDecember 22, 1987
Docket5406
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 534 A.2d 918 (Kerpa v. A & A Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerpa v. A & A Bros., 534 A.2d 918, 13 Conn. App. 807 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s first, second and sixth claims of error were not raised in the trial court; consequently, we will not consider those claims. The plaintiff’s third, fourth and fifth elaims of error invoke the discretionary function of the court. Our review of the record, transcript and briefs fails to disclose any abuse of such discretion.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kerpa v. A & A Bros.
541 A.2d 1238 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 A.2d 918, 13 Conn. App. 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerpa-v-a-a-bros-connappct-1987.