Kernin v. Hill

37 Ill. 209
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 37 Ill. 209 (Kernin v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kernin v. Hill, 37 Ill. 209 (Ill. 1865).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the court:

On the trial of this case, experts were called by the plaintiff below, to whom were shown the signatures of certain affidavits made by the plaintiff, and on file on the cause, and they were asked and permitted to state, against the objections of the defendant, whether the signatures to the affidavits and to the notes sued on were by the same person. This was error. Whatever we might be inclined to hold were the question before us for the first time, it must be considered the law of this State, that the genuineness of a signature can not be proved by comparing it with another signature admitted to be genuine. Jumpertz v. The People, 21 Ill., 408.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stitzel v. Miller
157 Ill. App. 390 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1910)
Pierce v. De Long
45 Ill. App. 462 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1892)
Bevan v. Atlanta National Bank
31 N.E. 679 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Frank v. Taubman
31 Ill. App. 592 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)
Gitchell v. Ryan
24 Ill. App. 372 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)
Snow v. Wiggin
19 Ill. App. 542 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1886)
Melvin v. Hodges
71 Ill. 422 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Ill. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kernin-v-hill-ill-1865.