Kerney v. Kahn

218 A.2d 403, 46 N.J. 535, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 282
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 4, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 218 A.2d 403 (Kerney v. Kahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerney v. Kahn, 218 A.2d 403, 46 N.J. 535, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 282 (N.J. 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order striking plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We certified the appeal prior to argument in the Appellate Division.

Plaintiff’s basic contention is that the James Kerney Foundation (incorporated not for pecuniary profit under N. J. S. A. 15:1-1 et seq.), was organized by its founders to benefit Korean Catholic charities exclusively and that the Foundation trustees, the individual defendants, in not exclusively limiting the grants to such charities violated their duties.

The purposes and objects provisions of the Foundation certificate of incorporation state:

“1. To memorialize and honor the memory of the late James Kerney, distinguished editor, jurist, diplomat, statesman, philanthropist and author, by assisting worthy charities and welfare organizations, and
2. To make contributions, loans, gifts and render financial or other assistance to organizations and associations, hospitals and institutions engaged in charitable and eleemosynary or social welfare work of the City of Trenton, New Jersey and vicinity.”

We cannot find any such limitation in this clear language. There is no ambiguity whatever. The limitation which plaintiff seeks to apply cannot be established by parol evidence of the private intent of a contributing incorporator. Nor can a contributor, upon a claim that he so intended, seek to undo the contract of incorporation and to recover what he put in.

Affirmed.

For affirmance ■— Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Fbancis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettiho — 6.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 A.2d 403, 46 N.J. 535, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerney-v-kahn-nj-1966.